The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the law that, in Nova Scotia, where a plaintiff has been found to be contributorily negligent, his or her recovery is limited to the liability apportioned to each defendant individually.
Perrin was a passenger on an all-terrain vehicle driven by Blake. They were involved in an accident with another driver, Adshade. Adshade did not have insurance coverage. Blake held an insurance policy with Nordic Insurance Company of Canada. Perrin commenced an action for damages against Blake, Adshade, and Nordic, under Blake’s uninsured vehicle coverage. Both Blake and Nordic argued that Perrin was contributorily negligent and relied on the Nova Scotia Contributory Negligence Act, RSNS 1989, c 95.
The parties brought a motion under Civil Procedure Rule 12 for a determination of law concerning the question of whether a plaintiff, who bears some contributory negligence, can recover against the defendants jointly and severally (meaning the plaintiff can collect the entire judgment from any one of the parties) or whether the plaintiff’s recovery is limited to the liability apportioned to each defendant severally.
Perrin argued that although existing case law in Nova Scotia has interpreted s. 3 of the Contributory Negligence Act to limit the responsibility of a defendant to his or her proportionate allocation where a plaintiff has been contributorily negligent, equivalent legislation in other provinces has been interpreted in such a way that recovery remains joint and several. Perrin argued that this interpretation should be followed in Nova Scotia as well.
The Court disagreed and held that although the Nova Scotia statute is similar to that seen in other provinces, the absence of the words “jointly and severally” in the Act is significant. The Court found that the Legislature’s decision to exclude these words from the Act signaled an intention to limit a plaintiff’s right of recovery. Despite contrary case law in other jurisdictions, where a plaintiff in Nova Scotia is found to be contributorily negligent, the law remains that he or she can only then recover from each individual defendant that portion of liability attributed to that particular defendant.
In cases involving a contributorily negligent plaintiff and multiple defendants, it is important to take note of the applicable contributory negligence legislation. In cases where the Nova Scotia Act applies, a defendant is only liable for the specific portion of liability found by the court.
Written by F. Richard Gosse. Background The concept is not new – parties committing to provide work or services decide to write down what each expects of the other: a scope of work, a mechanism for payment, some general provision for timelines, changes, and warranties or the like. More sophisticated engagements may (or may not) […]
read moreIntroduction Artificial intelligence holds the promise of delivering new waves of efficiency and productivity in the workplace, but it also carries risk for employers who don’t mitigate operational, reputational, and legal risks associated with unauthorized use. Generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot are free tools at the fingertips of employees. […]
read moreIntroduction The recent ruling against Air Canada by the Civil Resolution Tribunal of British Columbia has sent ripples through the business and legal communities. The case centered around misinformation provided by Air Canada’s chatbot, leading to a landmark decision on AI accountability. This article delves into the case’s specifics, the tribunal’s reasoning, and the broader […]
read more
