Amendments to the New Brunswick Employment Standards Act

April 22, 2020

Written by Jamie Eddy, KC.

On Friday, legislation was passed to amend the Employment Standards Act to provide for an emergency leave to protect workers’ jobs during states of emergency and public health threats.  An Act to Amend the Employment Standards Act (the “Act”) provides that an employer must grant an employee a leave of absence in accordance with the regulations made by the provincial government (yet to be released), during the current state of emergency and any future states of emergency or threats to public health.

The Act provides that the government may make regulations regarding matters such as:

  • the eligibility requirements for emergency leaves,
  • the purposes for which the leave may be taken, and
  • whether the leave may be taken as paid or unpaid.

The Act also gives the government power to make regulations which deem a suspension, layoff, dismissal or termination of employment an emergency leave of absence.

An emergency leave must be in accordance with the regulations. The regulations have not yet been released but we will provide an update once further information is available.

What does an employee need to do in order to take an emergency leave?

In order for an employee to take an emergency leave, they must meet the eligibility requirements prescribed by regulation. As the regulations have not yet been released, it is not clear at this time what will be required for an employee to take an emergency leave.

What does this mean for employers?

In effect, the amendments allow for the government to make regulations that:

  • deem a suspension, layoff, dismissal, or termination of employment an emergency leave of absence,
  • determine on which date the leave of absence commenced, and
  • determine the duration of the leave.

The Act provides that the government can determine that a leave of absence was deemed to commence before the date on which the regulations come into force. This means that, with respect to any employees currently laid off, suspended, dismissed, or terminated for COVID-19-related reasons, the government could make regulations that deem those employees to be on a leave of absence, rather than laid off, suspended, or terminated.

The details with respect to the eligibility for an emergency leave, the length of the leave, any documentation required to verify the leave, whether the leave will be paid or unpaid, and whether certain layoffs, suspensions, or terminations will be deemed to be emergency leaves will be established by regulation. We will provide further details about the requirements for emergency leaves when the regulations become available.

This article was written by Katelyn Mangold, an Articled Clerk in Cox & Palmer’s Fredericton office.
Katelyn Mangold | 506.453.9638 | kmangold@coxandpalmer.com

Related Services

Employment & Labour

Related Articles

PEI: Required Workplace Policies & Legislative Amendments

Written by Maggie Hughes, Associate and Kaylee Campbell, Articled Clerk Workplace policies are a helpful tool to provide employees with clear expectations. This may include setting parameters around expected employee conduct or outlining procedures to streamline processes. While there are a wide range of policies that any one organization may implement, it is important to […]

read more

Labour Arbitrators, not Human Rights Tribunals, have exclusive jurisdiction over alleged human rights disputes arising from Collective Agreements

On October 22, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada released the decision of Northern Regional Health Authority v Horrocks, 2021 SCC 42 in which it explained that human rights tribunals are without jurisdiction to consider human rights disputes arising from the interpretation, application or alleged violation of a collective agreement. Such issues fall within the […]

read more

Without Cause Termination Provisions: The Potential Ace in an Employer’s Hand

The New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench has recently clarified the law regarding without cause termination provisions. The decision, Stéphane Vienneau v. Joy Global (Canada) Ltd., 2020 NBQB 76, explains that a properly worded termination provision is valid and enforceable even if it limits the employee’s entitlements to those set out in the Employment Standards […]

read more
view all
Cox & Palmer publications are intended to provide information of a general nature only and not legal advice. The information presented is current to the date of publication and may be subject to change following the publication date.