An employer dismissed its employee without cause and provided him with 6 months’ severance pay. A labour arbitrator decided that the employee’s allegation of unjust dismissal was made out because the Canada Labour Code (CLC) only permitted dismissals for cause. The decision of Redlon Agencies Ltd. v. Norgren, 2005 FC 804 (“Redlon”), was cited for this premise.
On judicial review of this decision, the Federal Court found that Redlon did not stand for the proposition that the CLC permitted only dismissals for cause. In Redlon, the Arbitrator determined that no entitlement of an employee to severance under the CLC does not mean that he or she cannot be entitled to compensation for unjust dismissal.
An employer under federal jurisdiction can dismiss an employee without cause under the CLC if it gives notice or severance pay (sections 230 and 235), but an employee can still complain that the dismissal is unjust (exceptions are: lay-off, discontinuance of a position and where another statutory remedy exists), and an arbitrator may additionally award a remedy within his or her broad remedial powers if one is merited.
The case was remitted back to a different arbitrator to determine whether the dismissal was just and whether a remedy would be appropriate.
Click here for a PDF copy of the Federal Court decision.
Written by Maggie Hughes, Associate and Kaylee Campbell, Articled Clerk Workplace policies are a helpful tool to provide employees with clear expectations. This may include setting parameters around expected employee conduct or outlining procedures to streamline processes. While there are a wide range of policies that any one organization may implement, it is important to […]
read moreWritten by Ben Ladner Once your corporation is established, it is important to take the necessary steps to set a solid foundation. This checklist outlines essential post-incorporation tasks, from tax filings to corporate governance, to help you navigate the next phase of your business journey. Read more: Post-Incorporation Checklist: Essential Next Steps
read moreWritten by F. Richard Gosse. Background The concept is not new – parties committing to provide work or services decide to write down what each expects of the other: a scope of work, a mechanism for payment, some general provision for timelines, changes, and warranties or the like. More sophisticated engagements may (or may not) […]
read more
